The University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine creates a variety of venues to support high quality learning and teaching, which the attendance policy strives to support by honoring students' varied learning styles and by allowing faculty and course directors to maintain the integrity of the curriculum. Working in conjunction with the teaching faculty of a course, the course director(s) will specify which educational sessions are mandatory or optional and post this information in the course syllabus or student calendar well in advance of the session.
- Academic Standing
The Committee on Student Progress (CSP) is responsible for making recommendations to the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs (ADAA) on matters related to student performance, including disciplinary and academic matters. As it deems necessary, the CSP may identify students experiencing academic difficulties and inform appropriate faculty and administrative personnel of such to initiate corrective or remedial action which needs to be taken. Annually, CSP makes recommendations to the Dean on the promotion of students to the next class. Also, each year CSP recommends to the faculty, through the Dean, the awarding of the degree of Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine to those students who have satisfied all graduation requirements.
The CSP may review the status of a student whenever the student's performance is found to be unsatisfactory in the accumulation of knowledge or skills and/or personal growth. For example, the student’s academic progress may be reviewed for any of the following reasons:
- Unexcused absence(s) from class, laboratory, or clinical experience.
- Failure to obtain a satisfactory grade in every unit of study such as a course, preceptorship, clinical rotation (clerkship) or other educational activities.
- Failure to obtain a satisfactory grade in either the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Self-Assessment Examination (COMSAE), or Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX).
- Failure to abide by the Standards for Professional Behavior and Conduct or to exhibit the behavior, ethics, or professional manner deemed necessary, in the judgment of the Committee on Student Progress, for the continued study and later practice of osteopathic medicine.
- Personal or medical reasons; in assessing personal growth, such factors as morals, emotional stability, integrity, general conduct, reliability, judgment, and rapport with patients is considered.
After discussion and deliberation on any matter, CSP may decide by majority vote to make one of the following recommendations to the Dean:
- No significant deficiency exists, and the student is promoted, with such oral or written caution to the student as may be recommended.
- A significant deficiency exists and one or several of the following actions must be taken according to the severity of the deficiency, the student's overall achievement and circumstances surrounding the deficiency (illness, family emergency, etc.):
- Student is to take remedial examination(s) after an appropriate interval recommended by the course director(s) and approved by a majority vote of the Committee on Student Progress.
- Student is to undertake special projects or studies required to address the perceived deficiency.
- Student is placed on academic or disciplinary probation for a stated period of time.
- Student is required to repeat the course(s), preceptorship(s), clerkship(s), or other educational activity in which there is a deficiency.
- Student is required to repeat the academic year.
- Student is recommended for a leave of absence or suspension from the College.
- Student is recommended for dismissal from the College.
A student who is required to repeat an academic year or is suspended or dismissed from the College may appeal this decision to the Dean according to the guidelines in the University Student Handbook. The Dean may, at his/her discretion, convene a Faculty Appeals Committee for a review of the decision. The charge of the Faculty Appeals Committee will not be to repeat the deliberations of the Committee on Student Progress, but rather to determine whether or not the following conditions apply to the original decision:
- New information is available at this time that was not available to the original recommending committee (CSP), or
- Evidence exists that the decision the recommending committee reached was capricious or arbitrary, or
- Consequence of the deliberation (e.g., dismissal, etc.) is unusually harsh or unfair.
If the Faculty Appeals Committee upholds the original recommendation, the decision is final and there is no further appeal. If the Faculty Appeals Committee does not uphold the requirement to repeat the year, suspension or dismissal, it will recommend to the Dean such other requirements, as it deems appropriate.
Probation: Placement of a student on academic probation or disciplinary probation indicates the student’s failure to maintain satisfactory academic or behavioral performance. While on probation, the student will not represent the college at outside events and will be asked to curtail elected office responsibilities until their performance improves. In addition, a student on academic probation must pass all units of study; a student on disciplinary probation must discontinue the behavior leading to probation and maintain a record of exemplary behavior. Students who violate the conditions of probation as listed above will be reviewed again by CSP, which will make such recommendations to the Associate Dean of Academic Affairs (ADAA) as it sees fit.
An application for voluntary withdrawal from the College must be submitted in writing to the Dean. The Dean may grant a leave of absence due to financial difficulties or for personal, medical, or family problems.
- Academic Progress Policy
- Course Failures
- All students are expected to meet the requirements for passing by the end of a course.
- Any student who is assigned a grade of Failure (F) for a course, including for failure to meet criteria for professional behavior, will meet with CSP.
- Based upon the student’s overall academic performance, CSP will, in consultation with the Course Director for the failed course, make one of the following recommendations:
- repeat the course when it is next offered, or
- repeat the entire academic year, or
- dismissal from the college.
- Course Retesting or Remediation Policy
- The syllabus of the original course, which requires Curriculum Advisory Committee (CAC) approval, will specify the dates and duration of any allowable retesting or remedial activity.
- All courses that allow for remedial activity and reassessment prior to issuing a final course grade following unsuccessful achievement of criteria for passing must develop, describe and publish in the course syllabus a plan for reassessment and/or remediation.
- With permission of CSP, a UNE COM student who is assigned a final grade of Failure (F) in a course which allows retesting or remediation may enroll in a formal remediation activity approved by the Curriculum Advisory Committee and the course director.
- Permission to pursue retesting or remedial activity will be based upon:
- the criteria for eligibility published in the course syllabus and
- the student’s overall performance in all other UNE COM courses (concurrent and previous).
- The remediation activity will:
- be constructed and monitored by the original course director, or, if it is conducted at a remote site, monitored by the original course director;
- be listed with the Registrar as a separate course; and,
- carry a tuition charge.
- The syllabus of the original course, which requires CAC approval, will specify the dates and duration of the remedial activity.
- Upon successful completion of the retesting or remedial activity, the student will be given a grade of Pass (P) for the course.
- Failure on the assessment following the completion of a retest or remediation activity will result in the student being considered for one of the following actions:
- repeat the course when it is next offered, or
- repeat the academic year, or
- dismissal from the college.