This website uses cookies to understand how you use the website and to improve your experience. By continuing to use the website, you accept the University of New England’s use of cookies and similar technologies. To learn more about our use of cookies and how to manage your browser cookie settings, please review our Privacy Notice.


Jennifer Stiegler-Balfour presents e-reader research study at New England Psychological Association conference

Jennifer Stiegler-Balfour recently presented in Manchester, New Hampshire at the annual NEPA conference
Jennifer Stiegler-Balfour recently presented in Manchester, New Hampshire at the annual NEPA conference

December 04, 2019

Jennifer Stiegler-Balfour, Ph.D., associate professor and psychology program coordinator in the Department of Psychology, and alum Ellie Leighton, B.A. '18 (Psychology) recently presented research findings at the New England Psychological Association (NEPA) conference, an annual meeting of psychology professionals dedicated to the advancement of psychology as a science, a profession, and a means of promoting human welfare.

Stiegler-Balfour’s presentation, titled “An Investigation into the Effects of Structure Building Ability on Comprehension on E-readers for Expository and Narrative Text,” investigated why consumers continue to display a preference for print textbooks despite the many benefits of e-textbooks. The study also examined whether reading comprehension ability played a role when choosing between a print versus digital textbook.

Stiegler-Balfour examined differences in reading speed and a cued-recognition task for individuals reading either narrative or expository text on an e-reader. The results showed that better structure builders were more likely to adapt their reading speed to maintain equal comprehension levels across text types, whereas lower ability structure builders failed to adapt their reading pace, and, thus, their comprehension suffered when reading expository text on an e-reader.

Overall, the results suggest that reading on digital mediums is comparable to reading traditional print textbooks; however, the results also indicate that reading e-textbooks is less efficient than reading print textbooks, as it takes longer to read.

Groups audience: